>>I took the wiki from Relentless so that I could give it back to the community and empower those who know what they are doing raid-wise with Sysop access. A website belongs to its community. Your attitude that the information on the wiki somehow belongs to one group or the other is indicative of the lack of respect you have for Anonymous, who you are supposed to be serving.

>We're not serving any specific group, not even Anonymous. The wiki is free to be edited and read by anyone who so wishes. The one requirement is that they must be in it for the lulz.

Anonymous is not a group, it's a concept that is simple: a website belongs to its community, to its Anonymous users. Information should be judged on its own merit, not on the reputation of the person speaking.

If you don't serve Anonymous, you are biting the hand that feeds you. Your statement again demonstrates the lack of respect and understanding you have for your own userbase.

You say anyone who uses your wiki must be in it for the lulz, but from what I've seen you take yourselves way too seriously.

>Regardless, I don't know how you expect anyone to trust you. You took the database from Relentless (with the user table and password hashes intact), and SOMEHOW sometime after that someone gets into one of our login shells and locks everyone out while defacing the website. Then you start claiming that nobody should use partyvan.info because they were hacked and they're also controlled by fel0ny. Hmmm. Bet it has 'nothing' to do with you begging your users to click the ads on all your sites and vote for them on chantoplist.

How could we possibly get into one of the login shells from information in the database? You morons forgot to clear all the shell accounts when you set up the wiki (which was a real eyesore in the first place) and a member of fel0ny happened to have an old shell on the server.

The fact that you fags got rooted in the first place, as well as the just plain uninformed accusations you level at me demonstrate the lack of knowledge you have about your own server and wiki software, and cast doubt on your ability to operate a server securely and responsibly.


>>I like how you try to steal a community and then slam it in the same breath. Very classy.

>Steal? Are you implying that you own the community? I'm shocked and appalled ?_?. If anything, you took it and wiped your ass with it.

When mooncup has:

- Closed #insurgency on AnonNET and redirected it to chatnets #insurgency against the will of those who wanted to use it
- Gained ops in TheInternetz #invasion and proceeded to kickban people with the false message "this room has moved to chatnets #insurgency
- Several members of your circlejerk spammed AnonNewsWire with the false claim that insurgen.cc had moved back over to partyvan.info

Yes, you attempted several times to steal a userbase and/or coerce it into using partyvan.info and your officially approved IRC channel against their will.

>>>You are such a gullible retarded faggot.

>>Yes, fel0ny is a real group, they are not a troll. The only reason everyone associated with them is calling it a troll is because they don't want to get raped like netcollect was. mooncup, being a member of fel0ny, also hosts partyvan.info now. Is this really someone you want hosting the home base of the /i/nsurgency, especially considering how many times he has oper abused raid channels on AnonNET, such as #antfuck? And considering that he plotted to destroy two IRC networks in The Internetz and Terogen in an attempt to force the #fm community to move back over to AnonNET against their will? Someone who complains about moralfaggotry from 888chan and then says in IRC "I was a moralfag" to participate in Operation Baylout just so his friends on chatnets don't think less of him? And he claims that I am powerwhoring? Pull the fucking log from your own eye first, mooncup.

>You continue to prove that you're a gullible retarded faggot. That might explain why this "response" reads more like a quiz than anything else.

You continue to say this, but you fail to provide any arguments to back up this claim. Until such a time, I will continue to assert that:

- fel0ny is a real group of lamer skiddies and a thorn in the side of the *chans, the /i/nsurgency, and the idea of Anonymous, and should be raped with the full force of same just as netcollect was
- mooncup is a member of fel0ny and as the host of partyvan.info, presents a clear and damning conflict of interest to partyvan.info.

>As for the abuse, being a newfolk, you wouldn't remember the old days of the wiki / partyvan. There was probably more abuse going on both back then than on all of the "anon" Networks today. People were kicked for spaiing (idling for more than 30 mins without voice), there was a daily `clear users in all the popular channels, and janus z-lined people for discussing felonies in #insurgency. Yet somehow we still pulled off more better raids than all this stupid stuff that goes on today. Subeta, /b/spays, Myspays, Alex Wuori, and epilepsy to name a few. These raids weren't ideologically based. Their basis was pure lulz. People were forced to buy dogs, and even curtains. Just look at any of the current raids under your capitalist reign and you'll see that this isn't true anymore.

- mooncup hosts your goddamn wiki
- he joined this community at the same time I did, for Chanology, and participated in protests, just like I did. The only difference is I'm not afraid to admit this fact for fear of losing e-rep from a band of fags who take themselves way too seriously.
- Are you asserting that this oper abuse should have happened, that it was a good thing, and that Anons should just live with it now like they lived with it in the past? This is how you ran this goddamn community into the ground.
- Several of the raids partyvan did back in the day WERE in fact ideologically based, such as the Hal Turner raid. People afraid of "moralfaggotry" like to overlook this point though.
- Anons need to be raiding /something/ just to get the /i/nsurgency back on its feet after you so thoroughly ran it into the ground with your oper abuse and serious business.

>And please, lay off mooncup, he's going to moralfags anonymous. Not like it matters anyways. Chanology-related stuff is now allowed as long as they can prove it's for the lulz and not because Scientology is incompatible with their ideology or some manner of PA request. The same goes for all the other articles.

>Kerx out.

Again you take yourselves too seriously by treating "moralfaggotry" like the goddamn Scarlet Letter, as though you aren't just a bunch of faggots on the internet anyway, like we all are.

As for mooncup, don't stop me now, I'm having a good time, having a ball.